Over 100 5 star google reviews from Cannabis lawyer canada

We Serve Clients In Many Industries, Including But Not Limited To:
Cannabis • Psychedelics • Vaping • Liquor • Tobacco • Excise Duty • Food & Drugs • Natural Health Products (NHPs) • Consumer Packaged Goods (CPG) • Money Services Businesses (MSBs), AML & FINTRAC • Payment Service Providers • Crypto • NFTs

How To Get Oppression Remedy Against A Corporation in Ontario

Helping Businesses in Canada Stay Onside And Resolve Their Legal Challenges.

Understanding the Legal Framework for Oppression Remedy in Ontario

The Basis of Oppression Remedy Under the Ontario Business Corporations Act

The Oppression Remedy is a powerful tool for shareholders and stakeholders who find themselves unfairly treated by a corporation. It is enshrined in section 248 of the Ontario Business Corporations Act (OBCA), which allows the court to intervene when corporate actions have unfairly disregarded the interests of any shareholder, creditor, director, or officer. The remedy aims to correct situations where corporate conduct has been unjust or inequitable.

When seeking an oppression remedy, it is crucial to understand the broad range of equitable remedies available. The OBCA empowers judges to make any order they see fit to rectify the situation, reflecting the flexible nature of this legal recourse. Substance Law can provide expert guidance through the complexities of these claims, ensuring that your case is presented with the utmost proficiency.

Recent appellate decisions, such as those summarized in ‘Key Takeaways From 2023 Appellate Decisions – Aird & Berlis LLP’, highlight the evolving landscape of oppression remedy law. For instance, in Wag and Train Inc., 2023 ONCA 92, the Court of Appeal held that a director was personally liable under the oppression remedy for actions that detrimentally affected the company’s value. This underscores the importance of staying informed and seeking professional legal services to navigate these intricate legal waters.

Distinguishing Between Provincial and Federal Jurisdiction

When seeking an oppression remedy in Ontario, it is crucial to understand the jurisdictional nuances that may affect your case. The oppression remedy provisions are outlined in section 248 of the Ontario Business Corporations Act (OBCA), while a near-identical provision exists in section 241 of the Canada Business Corporations Act for federal corporations. Determining the appropriate act to plead under is a fundamental step in ensuring the legitimacy of your claim.

See also  What Kinds of Trademarks Can I File For in Canada?

Pursuing an Oppression Remedy Claim

Identifying the Remedies Available Through Oppression Claims

When shareholders or stakeholders feel aggrieved by the actions of a corporation, the oppression remedy serves as a powerful tool to address such grievances. The Ontario Business Corporations Act grants courts the authority to order a wide range of equitable remedies to rectify oppressive conduct. These remedies can be tailored to the specific circumstances of the case and may include:

  • Compensation for losses incurred due to oppressive actions
  • Appointment or removal of directors
  • Setting aside transactions deemed unfair or prejudicial
  • Dissolution of the corporation in extreme cases
  • Directing an investigation into the corporation’s affairs
  • Requiring a trial to resolve disputed issues

It is important to note that while the oppression remedy is broad, it is not without limits. A claimant must demonstrate that their expectations were both legitimate and reasonable, as these concepts have been shaped by judicial interpretation over time. Substance Law, with its knowledge in business law matters and a range of legal services, can guide you through the complexities of oppression remedy claims to ensure your interests are effectively represented.

The Two-Part Test for Establishing an Oppression Claim

The path to a successful oppression remedy claim is navigated through a two-part test established by the Supreme Court of Canada. Initially, the complainant must demonstrate that their reasonable expectations have been violated by the corporation’s conduct. These expectations, while varied, must be grounded in the company’s practices, agreements, or the general commercial context.

The second part of the test requires proving that the conduct was oppressive, unfairly prejudicial, or unfairly disregarded the interests of any security holder, creditor, director, or officer. It is essential to establish that the conduct in question has specifically targeted or affected the complainant’s interests in a manner that is considered unjust or inequitable.

See also  Preparing For an AGCO Liquor Sales Licence Public Meeting

Strategic Considerations in Bringing Forward an Oppression Remedy Case

When considering the pursuit of an oppression remedy against an Ontario corporation, strategic planning is crucial. Substance Law can guide you through this complex process, ensuring that your case is presented effectively. It is essential to understand that oppression is an equitable remedy, requiring a thorough analysis of all the facts and circumstances. Each case is unique, and past case law alone cannot determine the outcome.

The popularity of the oppression remedy stems from its flexibility and the court’s discretion to offer creative solutions. However, the remedy is not without limits; a complainant’s expectations must be legitimate and reasonable. This is where the knowledge of Substance Law can be invaluable, helping to frame your expectations and arguments in a manner that aligns with legal precedents and principles.

Here are some key strategic considerations:

  1. Assess the legitimacy and reasonableness of your expectations.
  2. Determine whether your case can bypass the need for court leave, unlike derivative actions.
  3. Evaluate the potential remedies and tailor your claim to seek the most appropriate form of relief.

Substance Law can assist in navigating these considerations, leveraging their knowledge of capital markets and automotive knowledge where relevant to your oppression claim.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the oppression remedy is a powerful tool available to shareholders and stakeholders in Ontario corporations to address wrongful corporate conduct. As outlined in section 248 of the Ontario Business Corporations Act, and similarly in section 241 of the Canada Business Corporations Act, this remedy provides a broad range of equitable solutions to aggrieved parties. Success in an oppression remedy claim hinges on a well-founded application that meets the two-part test established by the Supreme Court of Canada. It is essential for claimants to understand the intricacies of the applicable statutes and to seek experienced legal counsel to navigate the complexities of such claims. Our firm’s track record of success in both defending and pursuing oppression remedy claims at all levels of Ontario courts underscores the importance of expert guidance in these matters. Whether you are a shareholder, an ousted officer, or a director seeking redress, the oppression remedy offers a robust avenue for seeking justice and protecting your interests in corporate disputes.

See also  Get an NHP Product Licence in Canada

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the legal basis for an oppression remedy claim under Ontario law?

The legal basis for an oppression remedy claim in Ontario is defined in section 248 of the Ontario Business Corporations Act (OBCA), which allows a court to intervene when the conduct of a corporation or its affiliates affects or threatens to affect a stakeholder in a way that is unfairly prejudicial or disregards their interests.

How do I determine if I should file my oppression remedy claim under Ontario or federal jurisdiction?

The jurisdiction for an oppression remedy claim depends on whether the corporation is provincially or federally incorporated. If the company is governed by Ontario law, the claim is filed under the OBCA. If it is a federal corporation, the claim is filed under the Canada Business Corporations Act. It’s important to review the corporation’s incorporation documents to determine the correct jurisdiction.

What remedies are available through an oppression remedy claim in Ontario?

The range of remedies available through an oppression remedy claim in Ontario is broad and equitable. Judges have the discretion to make any order they see fit under section 248(3) of the OBCA, which can include orders to compensate affected parties, regulate the conduct of the corporation’s affairs, or amend or rescind any agreements or transactions.

Get In Touch With Us Now